Hot pursuit Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Hot pursuit - Essay ExampleThe briny principle or premise that underlies this rule is that an act is deemed to be committed not only where the tangible movements occur but similarly where the consequences take effect. (Williams, 1939).The main justification of the hot pursuit exception is reposed in the landmark case of Warden v. Hayden (387 U.S. 294 1967) where the warrantless entry of the police into the house of the suspect was deemed justified by the majority because the exigencies of the position make that go imperative (p. 298). But a rule to follow, harmonise to Worrall (2011), is that the nature of the exigency defines the reach of the search. This means that the exigency must be of so grave a nature and so obligate a reason before a search may be commenced without a warrant. This case of Warden also propounded other justifications. According to Justice Brennan, the imperatives of the Fourth Amendment does not require police officers to delay in the course of an investi gation if to do so would gravely danger their lives or the lives of others (pp. 298-299). It was also reasonable for the police officers, according to the decision, to ensure that had control of all weapons which could be used against them or to effect an escape (p. 299).Another master(prenominal) rule to consider is that there must be no time at all to lead a warrant. If there is a reasonable period of time that the police officers can use to pimp a warrant, because the most prudent course of action would simply to get the warrant and then apprehend the suspect or search his premises on the strength of the warrant of arrest or search warrant. In the case of Welsh v. Wisconsin (466 U.S. 740 1984) the Court held that the hot pursuit exception cannot be made to apply because there was no immediate or continuous pursuit of the petitioner from the scene of the detestation.The doctrine of hot pursuit is relevant in issues of maritime